Relevance of sarcopenia in elderly patients undergoing surgery for oral squamous cell carcinoma.

In the elderly population there is increasing evidence that frailty predicts adverse outcomes better than chronological age. Sarcopenia is an important component of frailty. This study aimed to establish the relevance of sarcopenia in elderly patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) undergoing surgery. This retrospective, single-centre, cohort study included patients over the age of 75 years who were diagnosed with OSCC between 2007 and 2016. Cross-sectional imaging of the neck was used to predict the Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI) using validated equations. Based on established thresholds, patients were categorised as having either a normal or low SMI, indicative of sarcopenia. Sixty-nine patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients with a low SMI had a longer length of stay (16.9 days vs 9.8 days, p = 0.030); they had more severe complications, defined as Clavien-Dindo grade IIIb or higher (17.6% vs 4.0%, p = 0.042); and their mean Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) was also higher (14.1 vs 4.7, p = 0.051). Furthermore, 2/34 patients in the low SMI group died within 30 days of surgery compared with none in the normal SMI group (5.9% vs 0%, p = 0.503). Whilst patients with a low SMI who underwent surgery had lower five-year overall survival, the difference was not statistically significant. This study shows that sarcopenia negatively influences surgical outcomes in elderly patients. Routine measurement of SMI could be an indication for a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA).

Patients understanding of terminology commonly used during combined orthodontic-orthognathic treatment.

BACKGROUND: Communication between patients and clinicians plays an important role in improving quality of healthcare and clinical outcomes and ensuring that patients understand medical terminology used by their physicians is a core aspect of this. The aim of this study is to evaluate the degree of patient understanding with respect to commonly used terms in a joint orthodontic-maxillofacial clinic in the context of preparing for combined orthodontic/orthognathic treatment. METHODS: Patients were recruited to partake in a short two-part questionnaire. Demographic data collected included participants' age, sex, level of education, fluency of English and whether English was their first language. In the second part of the questionnaire, participants were asked to identify the correct definition of 11 commonly used terms from a series of multiple-choice answers. RESULTS: 51 patients participated in this study ranging between ages 15 to 52. 86% of patients selected English as their first language and 37% reported having a university education. The overall mean score for the questionnaire was 44%, with the best understood term being 'retainers' at 80% correct and 'decalcification' the worst understood at 14% correct. An association between level of education and understanding of specific terms was detected. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the overall sub-optimal patient understanding of medical terminology used by clinicians on a joint orthodontic-maxillofacial orthognathic clinic. The authors of this study recommend further consideration to the terminology currently used as well as adapting the mode and frequency of information delivery, serving to improve patients' understanding and retention of medical conversations.